SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Navan

Other Expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Navan does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Navan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Navan has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Navan does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Navan does notNavan publishes, and they do not
Payhawkpayhawk.com 60/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Rydoorydoo.com 55/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Klippaklippa.com 52/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Emburseemburse.com 43/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Spendeskspendesk.com 43/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Rampramp.com 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Brexbrex.com 65/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Tipaltitipalti.com 48/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Expensifyexpensify.com 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named Compare
Mobilexpensemobilexpense.com 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Pleopleo.io 32/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Soldosoldo.com 25/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.