SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Payhawk

Other Expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Payhawk does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Payhawk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Payhawk has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Payhawk does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Payhawk does notPayhawk publishes, and they do not
Brexbrex.com 65/100 1 Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Navannavan.com 65/100 1 Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Rydoorydoo.com 55/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Klippaklippa.com 52/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Expensifyexpensify.com 43/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Spendeskspendesk.com 43/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Pleopleo.io 32/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
ExpensePointexpensepoint.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Findityfindity.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Airbaseairbase.com 9/100 1 Status page with history 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 Compare
Tipaltitipalti.com 48/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Emburseemburse.com 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.