SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Webexpenses

Other Expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Webexpenses. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Webexpenses on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Webexpenses has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Webexpenses” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at WebexpensesFound at Webexpenses, not found there
Brexbrex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brex 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
ExpenseInexpensein.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ExpenseIn 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Klippaklippa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Klippa 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Emburseemburse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Emburse 43/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Payhawkpayhawk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Payhawk 43/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Rydoorydoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rydoo 52/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Navannavan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navan 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
Tipaltitipalti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tipalti 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Spendeskspendesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spendesk 43/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Expensifyexpensify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Expensify 43/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
Mobilexpensemobilexpense.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mobilexpense 35/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Rampramp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ramp 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.