SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Ramp

Other Expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ramp does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Ramp on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ramp has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Ramp does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Ramp does notRamp publishes, and they do not
Brexbrex.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Navannavan.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Klippaklippa.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Payhawkpayhawk.com 57/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Rydoorydoo.com 55/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Tipaltitipalti.com 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Expensifyexpensify.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Spendeskspendesk.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Emburseemburse.com 43/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Mobilexpensemobilexpense.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Pleopleo.io 32/100 1 Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
ExpensePointexpensepoint.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.