Transparency alternatives to BlackLine
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at BlackLine. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from BlackLine on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
BlackLine has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at BlackLine” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at BlackLine | Found at BlackLine, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Pigmentpigment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pigment | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena | 52/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| IDUidusoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDU | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Kardinkardin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kardin | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Heluhelu.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Helu | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Numericnumeric.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Numeric | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Runwayrunway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Runway | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Trintechtrintech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trintech | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.