Transparency alternatives to Leapfin
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Leapfin. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Leapfin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Leapfin has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Leapfin” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Leapfin | Found at Leapfin, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| BlackLineblackline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlackLine | 38/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Pigmentpigment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pigment | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Planfulplanful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planful | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Anaplananaplan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anaplan | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph | 39/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| FloQastfloqast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloQast | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| IDUidusoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDU | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Treasury Intelligencetis.bizSee also Transparency alternatives to Treasury Intelligence | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.