Transparency alternatives to Kardin
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Kardin. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Kardin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kardin has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Kardin” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Kardin | Found at Kardin, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| BlackLineblackline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlackLine | 38/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Martusmartussolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Martus | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Planfulplanful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planful | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Anaplananaplan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anaplan | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Pigmentpigment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pigment | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Cubecubesoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cube | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Trintechtrintech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trintech | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.