Transparency alternatives to Vena
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Vena. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Vena on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Vena has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Vena” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Vena | Found at Vena, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Treasury Intelligencetis.bizSee also Transparency alternatives to Treasury Intelligence | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Cubecubesoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cube | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FloQastfloqast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloQast | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| IDUidusoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDU | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Kardinkardin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kardin | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Anaplananaplan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anaplan | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Kyribakyriba.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kyriba | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Runwayrunway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Runway | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.