Transparency alternatives to Planful
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Planful. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Planful on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Planful has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Planful” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Planful | Found at Planful, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena | 52/100 | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Cubecubesoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cube | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FloQastfloqast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloQast | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| IDUidusoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDU | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kardinkardin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kardin | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kyribakyriba.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kyriba | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Treasury Intelligencetis.bizSee also Transparency alternatives to Treasury Intelligence | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.