Transparency alternatives to Anaplan
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Anaplan. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Anaplan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Anaplan has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Anaplan” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Anaplan | Found at Anaplan, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| BlackLineblackline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlackLine | 38/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pigmentpigment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pigment | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| IDUidusoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDU | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kardinkardin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kardin | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FloQastfloqast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloQast | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Planfulplanful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planful | 30/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.