SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to FloQast

Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at FloQast. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from FloQast on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FloQast has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at FloQast” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at FloQastFound at FloQast, not found there
Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
BlackLineblackline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlackLine 38/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
Pigmentpigment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pigment 35/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Planfulplanful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planful 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap 17/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Anaplananaplan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anaplan 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant 22/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Runwayrunway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Runway 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Trintechtrintech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trintech 22/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.