Alternatives to Ravelin
Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ravelin does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Ravelin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ravelin has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Ravelin does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Ravelin does not | Ravelin publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veriffveriff.com | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Socuresocure.com | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Feedzaifeedzai.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Alloyalloy.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Shufti Proshuftipro.com | 36/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ondatoondato.com | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Signifydsignifyd.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| ComplyAdvantagecomplyadvantage.com | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ClearSaleclear.sale | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Truliootrulioo.com | 26/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fingerprintfingerprint.com | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| IDnowidnow.io | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.