SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Atlas

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Atlas does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Atlas on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Atlas has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Atlas does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Atlas does notAtlas publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Public pricing Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
LightBoxlightboxre.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.com 39/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ascent Cloudascentcloud.io 35/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Nearmapnearmap.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Geoapifygeoapify.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Maptilermaptiler.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
CARTOcarto.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.