SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Maptive

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Maptive does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Maptive on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Maptive has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Maptive does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Maptive does notMaptive publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 nothing Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 Public pricing Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 Public pricing Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
LightBoxlightboxre.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Ascent Cloudascentcloud.io 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Nearmapnearmap.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Feltfelt.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Geocortexvertigis.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Atlasatlas.co 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.