SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Yubico

Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Yubico does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Yubico on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Yubico has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Yubico does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Yubico does notYubico publishes, and they do not
Keeperkeepersecurity.com 85/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Ping Identitypingidentity.com 74/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Oktaokta.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
WorkOSworkos.com 60/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Descopedescope.com 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
1Password1password.com 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Clerkclerk.com 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Oryory.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Status page with history Compare
Passboltpassbolt.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Dashlanedashlane.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Fronteggfrontegg.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Duo Securityduo.com 48/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.