SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to FireHydrant

Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FireHydrant does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from FireHydrant on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FireHydrant has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and FireHydrant does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and FireHydrant does notFireHydrant publishes, and they do not
incident.ioincident.io 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
ilertilert.com 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Moogsoftmoogsoft.com 61/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Public pricing Compare
BigPandabigpanda.io 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
PagerDutypagerduty.com 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Jelijeli.io 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
All Quietallquiet.app 48/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Causelycausely.ai 48/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
AlertOpsalertops.com 43/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Everbridgeeverbridge.com 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
xMattersxmatters.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sorrysorryapp.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.