Transparency alternatives to Sorry
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sorry. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Sorry on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sorry has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Sorry” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sorry | Found at Sorry, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperpinghyperping.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperping | 74/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| incident.ioincident.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to incident.io | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| OhDearohdear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to OhDear | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moogsoft | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Resolveresolve.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Resolve | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Uptime.comuptime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptime.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| PagerDutypagerduty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PagerDuty | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| All Quietallquiet.appSee also Transparency alternatives to All Quiet | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Everbridgeeverbridge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Everbridge | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Rootlyrootly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rootly | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Causelycausely.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Causely | 35/100 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| SIGNL4signl4.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SIGNL4 | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.