SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PR Newswire

Other Investor relations and disclosure vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PR Newswire does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from PR Newswire on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PR Newswire has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and PR Newswire does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PR Newswire does notPR Newswire publishes, and they do not
Broadridgebroadridge.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
DFINdfinsolutions.com 17/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
AlphaSensealpha-sense.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Irwingetirwin.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Kirchhoff Consultkirchhoff.de 13/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Q4q4inc.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Quartrquartr.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Toppan Merrilltoppanmerrill.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
NetRoadshownetroadshow.com 10/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
MZ Groupmzgroup.us 5/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Kingsdalekingsdaleadvisors.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Sodali und Cosodali.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.