Transparency alternatives to Trademark Engine
Other Patent and trademark management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Trademark Engine. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Trademark Engine on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Trademark Engine has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Trademark Engine” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Trademark Engine | Found at Trademark Engine, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PatSnappatsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatSnap | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Doppeldoppel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doppel | 50/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| IPRallyiprally.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IPRally | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| PatentBotspatentbots.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatentBots | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Wellspringwellspring.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wellspring | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Amplifiedamplified.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Amplified | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| TechInsightstechinsights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TechInsights | 32/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Corsearchcorsearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corsearch | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| EBRANDebrand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EBRAND | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Questelquestel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Questel | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Relecurarelecura.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Relecura | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Inteuminteum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inteum | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.