Transparency alternatives to CARET Legal
Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at CARET Legal. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from CARET Legal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
CARET Legal has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at CARET Legal” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at CARET Legal | Found at CARET Legal, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luminanceluminance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Luminance | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cerenadecerenade.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerenade | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Litifylitify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Litify | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| MyCasemycase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyCase | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Amberloamberlo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Amberlo | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assembly Neos | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Smokeballsmokeball.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smokeball | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Eliteelite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elite | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| LawWarelawware.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to LawWare | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Actaportactaport.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Actaport | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| RA-MICROra-micro.deSee also Transparency alternatives to RA-MICRO | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Matters.Cloudmatters.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to Matters.Cloud | 35/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.