SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to RA-MICRO

Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that RA-MICRO does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from RA-MICRO on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

RA-MICRO has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and RA-MICRO does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and RA-MICRO does notRA-MICRO publishes, and they do not
Amberloamberlo.io 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Litifylitify.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Smokeballsmokeball.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Filevinefilevine.com 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
CARET Legalcaretlegal.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Luminanceluminance.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
MyCasemycase.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Definelydefinely.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Josefjoseflegal.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
LEAPleap.us 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
CosmoLexcosmolex.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.