SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Tabs3

Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Tabs3. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 48 that differ from Tabs3 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tabs3 has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Tabs3” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Tabs3Found at Tabs3, not found there
Luminanceluminance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Luminance 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Cerenadecerenade.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerenade 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Amberloamberlo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Amberlo 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Aderantaderant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aderant 30/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Litifylitify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Litify 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Smokeballsmokeball.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smokeball 35/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Eliteelite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elite 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Filevinefilevine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Filevine 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
MyCasemycase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyCase 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Actionstepactionstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Actionstep 13/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assembly Neos 35/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Matters.Cloudmatters.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to Matters.Cloud 35/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.