SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Rever

Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Rever does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from Rever on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Rever has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Rever does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Rever does notRever publishes, and they do not
Tuliptulip.co 39/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.net 26/100 4 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Dozukidozuki.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Ams Erpams-erp.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Evoconevocon.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Scytec DataXchangescytec.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Simussimus-systems.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Abasabas-erp.com 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Asset Scienceassetscience.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
BRAINRbrainr.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ECI Solutionsecisolutions.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.