Alternatives to Tulip
Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tulip does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Tulip on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Tulip has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Tulip does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Tulip does not | Tulip publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worximityworximity.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Ams Erpams-erp.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Simussimus-systems.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| ECI Solutionsecisolutions.com | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Inforinfor.com | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Evoconevocon.com | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Abasabas-erp.com | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.net | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.com | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Peakboardpeakboard.com | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Step Aheadstepahead.de | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Aveva MESaveva.com | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.