Transparency alternatives to Forcam Enisco
Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Forcam Enisco. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Forcam Enisco on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Forcam Enisco has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Forcam Enisco” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Forcam Enisco | Found at Forcam Enisco, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dozukidozuki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dozuki | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tuliptulip.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Tulip | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Reverreverscore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rever | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Evoconevocon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evocon | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Scytec DataXchangescytec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scytec DataXchange | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ams Erpams-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ams Erp | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Simussimus-systems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simus | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Asset Scienceassetscience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset Science | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BRAINRbrainr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BRAINR | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ECI Solutionsecisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ECI Solutions | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Machinemetrics | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Peakboardpeakboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Peakboard | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.