SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Dozuki

Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Dozuki. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from Dozuki on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Dozuki has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Dozuki” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at DozukiFound at Dozuki, not found there
Tuliptulip.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Tulip 39/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Evoconevocon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evocon 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Forcam Enisco 26/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Asset Scienceassetscience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset Science 17/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 Compare
Ams Erpams-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ams Erp 35/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Reverreverscore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rever 26/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Scytec DataXchangescytec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scytec DataXchange 26/100 1 Public pricing 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Abasabas-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abas 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
BRAINRbrainr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BRAINR 17/100 1 Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
ECI Solutionsecisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ECI Solutions 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Machinemetrics 17/100 1 Status page with history 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
MPDVmpdv.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MPDV 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.