SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Asset Science

Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Asset Science. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from Asset Science on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Asset Science has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Asset Science” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Asset ScienceFound at Asset Science, not found there
Dozukidozuki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dozuki 52/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Tuliptulip.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Tulip 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Reverreverscore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rever 26/100 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Ams Erpams-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ams Erp 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Forcam Enisco 26/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Simussimus-systems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simus 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Abasabas-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abas 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
ECI Solutionsecisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ECI Solutions 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
MPDVmpdv.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MPDV 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Evoconevocon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evocon 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Scytec DataXchangescytec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scytec DataXchange 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Machinemetrics 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.