SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Abas

Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Abas. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Abas on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Abas has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Abas” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AbasFound at Abas, not found there
Dozukidozuki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dozuki 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Tuliptulip.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Tulip 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Reverreverscore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rever 26/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Ams Erpams-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ams Erp 35/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Evoconevocon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evocon 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Scytec DataXchangescytec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scytec DataXchange 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Asset Scienceassetscience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset Science 17/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Forcam Enisco 26/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Simussimus-systems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simus 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
BRAINRbrainr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BRAINR 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
ECI Solutionsecisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ECI Solutions 17/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Machinemetrics 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.