SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Abas

Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Abas does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Abas on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Abas has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Abas does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Abas does notAbas publishes, and they do not
Worximityworximity.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Evoconevocon.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Ams Erpams-erp.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
ECI Solutionsecisolutions.com 17/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Peakboardpeakboard.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Step Aheadstepahead.de 17/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Inforinfor.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.net 17/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Aveva MESaveva.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Critical Manufacturingcriticalmanufacturing.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Named privacy contact Compare
MPDVmpdv.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.