Transparency alternatives to Lambda
Other MLOps and model serving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lambda. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Lambda on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lambda has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Lambda” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Lambda | Found at Lambda, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superwisesuperwise.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Superwise | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Basetenbaseten.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Baseten | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Nscalenscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nscale | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RunPodrunpod.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to RunPod | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Vast.aivast.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vast.ai | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Paperspacepaperspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paperspace | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Unionunion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Union | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CoreWeavecoreweave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CoreWeave | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| H2O.aih2o.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to H2O.ai | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Modalmodal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modal | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cometcomet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Comet | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Valohaivalohai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Valohai | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.