SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Arternal

Other Museum collections management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Arternal. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Arternal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Arternal has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Arternal” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ArternalFound at Arternal, not found there
Artlogicartlogic.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Artlogic 61/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Collectorsystemscollectorsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Collectorsystems 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Gallery Systemsgallerysystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gallery Systems 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Artbutlerartbutler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artbutler 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Hidastartext.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hida 14/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Preservicapreservica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Preservica 22/100 1 Certifications named 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Digitale Sammlungendigitale-sammlungen.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Digitale Sammlungen 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Robotron Daphnerobotron.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Robotron Daphne 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
First Rumoslandesmuseum.deSee also Transparency alternatives to First Rumos 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Imdasjoanneum.atSee also Transparency alternatives to Imdas 5/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Museumpluszetcom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Museumplus 5/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Wisskiwiss-ki.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Wisski 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.