SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Arternal

Other Museum collections management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Arternal does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Arternal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Arternal has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Arternal does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Arternal does notArternal publishes, and they do not
Artlogicartlogic.net 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 nothing Compare
Collectorsystemscollectorsystems.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Artbutlerartbutler.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hidastartext.de 14/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Artwork Archiveartworkarchive.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Gallery Systemsgallerysystems.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Preservicapreservica.com 22/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Digitale Sammlungendigitale-sammlungen.de 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Public pricing Compare
Arkivumarkivum.com 14/100 1 Data location stated 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
First Rumoslandesmuseum.de 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Imdasjoanneum.at 5/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Museumpluszetcom.com 5/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.