SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Artbutler

Other Museum collections management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Artbutler. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Artbutler on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Artbutler has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Artbutler” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ArtbutlerFound at Artbutler, not found there
Artlogicartlogic.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Artlogic 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Arternalarternal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arternal 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Collectorsystemscollectorsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Collectorsystems 39/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Preservicapreservica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Preservica 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Gallery Systemsgallerysystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gallery Systems 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Artwork Archiveartworkarchive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artwork Archive 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Digitale Sammlungendigitale-sammlungen.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Digitale Sammlungen 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Lucidealucidea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lucidea 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Robotron Daphnerobotron.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Robotron Daphne 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Hidastartext.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hida 14/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare
First Rumoslandesmuseum.deSee also Transparency alternatives to First Rumos 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Atomaccesstomemory.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Atom 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.