SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Gallery Systems

Other Museum collections management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Gallery Systems. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Gallery Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gallery Systems has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Gallery Systems” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Gallery SystemsFound at Gallery Systems, not found there
Artlogicartlogic.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Artlogic 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Arternalarternal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arternal 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Collectorsystemscollectorsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Collectorsystems 39/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Hidastartext.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hida 14/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Preservicapreservica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Preservica 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Artbutlerartbutler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artbutler 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Artwork Archiveartworkarchive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artwork Archive 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Digitale Sammlungendigitale-sammlungen.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Digitale Sammlungen 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Lucidealucidea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lucidea 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Robotron Daphnerobotron.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Robotron Daphne 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
First Rumoslandesmuseum.deSee also Transparency alternatives to First Rumos 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Imdasjoanneum.atSee also Transparency alternatives to Imdas 5/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.