Transparency alternatives to Collectorsystems
Other Museum collections management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Collectorsystems. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Collectorsystems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Collectorsystems has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Collectorsystems” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Collectorsystems | Found at Collectorsystems, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artlogicartlogic.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Artlogic | 61/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Arternalarternal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arternal | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Digitale Sammlungendigitale-sammlungen.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Digitale Sammlungen | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Robotron Daphnerobotron.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Robotron Daphne | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Hidastartext.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hida | 14/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Gallery Systemsgallerysystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gallery Systems | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Preservicapreservica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Preservica | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Artbutlerartbutler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artbutler | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Artwork Archiveartworkarchive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artwork Archive | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lucidealucidea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lucidea | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| First Rumoslandesmuseum.deSee also Transparency alternatives to First Rumos | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Atomaccesstomemory.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Atom | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.