Transparency alternatives to Artlogic
Other Museum collections management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Artlogic. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Artlogic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Artlogic has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Artlogic” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Artlogic | Found at Artlogic, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arternalarternal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arternal | 39/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Collectorsystemscollectorsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Collectorsystems | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Gallery Systemsgallerysystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gallery Systems | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Preservicapreservica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Preservica | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Digitale Sammlungendigitale-sammlungen.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Digitale Sammlungen | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Robotron Daphnerobotron.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Robotron Daphne | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Hidastartext.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hida | 14/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Artbutlerartbutler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artbutler | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Artwork Archiveartworkarchive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artwork Archive | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Lucidealucidea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lucidea | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| First Rumoslandesmuseum.deSee also Transparency alternatives to First Rumos | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Atomaccesstomemory.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Atom | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.