Transparency alternatives to zendit
Other Payment processing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at zendit. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from zendit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
zendit has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at zendit” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at zendit | Found at zendit, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxiomaxio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Maxio | 74/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Adyenadyen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Adyen | 52/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Molliemollie.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mollie | 52/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Airwallexairwallex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airwallex | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Paddlepaddle.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paddle | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| GoCardlessgocardless.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoCardless | 43/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Recurlyrecurly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Recurly | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Creemcreem.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Creem | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Stancerstancer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stancer | 39/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Stripestripe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stripe | 30/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Lemon Squeezylemonsqueezy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lemon Squeezy | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Squaresquareup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Square | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.