Transparency alternatives to Impressed
Other Print and packaging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Impressed. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Impressed on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Impressed has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Impressed” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Impressed | Found at Impressed, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threekitthreekit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Threekit | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Smart Communicationssmartcommunications.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smart Communications | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kickflipgokickflip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kickflip | 32/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 3DPrinterOS3dprinteros.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 3DPrinterOS | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Customilycustomily.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Customily | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SEAL Systemssealsystems.deSee also Transparency alternatives to SEAL Systems | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| WilcomWorkspacewilcom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WilcomWorkspace | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Prinectheidelberg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prinect | 27/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Teesomteesom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teesom | 27/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Francotyp-Postaliafp-francotyp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Francotyp-Postalia | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Printixprintix.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Printix | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Vjoonvjoon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vjoon | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.