Alternatives to GitGuardian
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that GitGuardian does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from GitGuardian on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
GitGuardian has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and GitGuardian does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and GitGuardian does not | GitGuardian publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StrongDMstrongdm.com | 65/100 | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Akeylessakeyless.io | 43/100 | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Dopplerdoppler.com | 83/100 | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.com | 78/100 | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| ConductorOneconductorone.com | 61/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Devolutionsdevolutions.net | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Indentindent.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Infisicalinfisical.com | 48/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Oleriaoleria.com | 48/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Cyolocyolo.io | 39/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Aponoapono.io | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Lumoslumos.com | 14/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.