SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Cyolo

Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cyolo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Cyolo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cyolo has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Cyolo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Cyolo does notCyolo publishes, and they do not
Dopplerdoppler.com 83/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Delineadelinea.com 78/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
GitGuardiangitguardian.com 65/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Devolutionsdevolutions.net 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Infisicalinfisical.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
StrongDMstrongdm.com 65/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
ConductorOneconductorone.com 61/100 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
NordLayernordlayer.com 48/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Netwrixnetwrix.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Indentindent.com 48/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Akeylessakeyless.io 43/100 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Heimdalheimdalsecurity.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.