SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to TotalBid

Other Procurement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at TotalBid. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from TotalBid on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

TotalBid has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at TotalBid” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at TotalBidFound at TotalBid, not found there
Keelvarkeelvar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keelvar 70/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Procurifyprocurify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procurify 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Onventisonventis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onventis 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Precoroprecoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precoro 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Zipziphq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zip 39/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Mediusmedius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Medius 30/100 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Yordexyordex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yordex 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Ivaluaivalua.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ivalua 30/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Pactumpactum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pactum 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Turbineturbinehq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Turbine 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Compleat Softwarecompleatsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Compleat Software 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Weprocweproc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weproc 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.