Transparency alternatives to Computhink
Other Records management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Computhink. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 16 that differ from Computhink on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Computhink has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Computhink” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Computhink | Found at Computhink, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Objective ECMobjective.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Objective ECM | 35/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| AvePoint Recordsavepoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AvePoint Records | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Collabwarecollabware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Collabware | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Synergis Adeptsynergissoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Synergis Adept | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Ricoh Recordsricoh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ricoh Records | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Square 9square-9.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Square 9 | 9/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| RecordPointrecordpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RecordPoint | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Access Corpaccesscorp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Access Corp | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cott Systemscottsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cott Systems | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Feithfeith.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feith | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| PreservationVaultinfopreserve.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PreservationVault | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Zasiozasio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zasio | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.