SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Ricoh Records

Other Records management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ricoh Records does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 12 that differ from Ricoh Records on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ricoh Records has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Ricoh Records does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Ricoh Records does notRicoh Records publishes, and they do not
Collabwarecollabware.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Objective ECMobjective.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
AvePoint Recordsavepoint.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Synergis Adeptsynergissoftware.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Computhinkcomputhink.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Feithfeith.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Zasiozasio.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Square 9square-9.com 9/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gimmalgimmal.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Access Corpaccesscorp.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
Filecenterfilecenter.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Konica Dispatcherkonicaminolta.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.