Transparency alternatives to Ricoh Records
Other Records management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ricoh Records. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 16 that differ from Ricoh Records on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ricoh Records has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ricoh Records” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ricoh Records | Found at Ricoh Records, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Objective ECMobjective.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Objective ECM | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| AvePoint Recordsavepoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AvePoint Records | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Collabwarecollabware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Collabware | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Synergis Adeptsynergissoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Synergis Adept | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| RecordPointrecordpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RecordPoint | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Computhinkcomputhink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Computhink | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Square 9square-9.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Square 9 | 9/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Gimmalgimmal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gimmal | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Webrecorder Browsertrixwebrecorder.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Webrecorder Browsertrix | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Access Corpaccesscorp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Access Corp | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Cott Systemscottsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cott Systems | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Feithfeith.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feith | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.