Alternatives to Adaface
Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Adaface does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Adaface on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Adaface has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Adaface does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Adaface does not | Adaface publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| CoderPadcoderpad.io | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| CodeSignalcodesignal.com | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Harverharver.com | 35/100 | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| HireVuehirevue.com | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| iMochaimocha.io | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Criteriacriteriacorp.com | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| HackerRankhackerrank.com | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Traitifytraitify.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Coderbytecoderbyte.com | 36/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Codilitycodility.com | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| eSkilleskill.com | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.