SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Adaface

Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Adaface. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 42 that differ from Adaface on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Adaface has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Adaface” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AdafaceFound at Adaface, not found there
Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Predictive Index 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
CoderPadcoderpad.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CoderPad 48/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
CodeSignalcodesignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CodeSignal 48/100 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Feenyxfeenyx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Feenyx 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Bryqbryq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bryq 70/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Toggl Hiretoggl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Toggl Hire 52/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
HireVuehirevue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HireVue 43/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Vervoevervoe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vervoe 35/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
iMochaimocha.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to iMocha 30/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Codilitycodility.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Codility 26/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
HiPeoplehipeople.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to HiPeople 26/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare
TestGorillatestgorilla.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TestGorilla 57/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.