SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to CodeSignal

Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CodeSignal does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from CodeSignal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CodeSignal has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and CodeSignal does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CodeSignal does notCodeSignal publishes, and they do not
HireVuehirevue.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Adafaceadaface.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Criteriacriteriacorp.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
HackerRankhackerrank.com 39/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Traitifytraitify.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
CoderPadcoderpad.io 48/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.com 48/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Data location stated Compare
Coderbytecoderbyte.com 36/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Harverharver.com 35/100 1 Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
iMochaimocha.io 30/100 1 Certifications named 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Willowillo.video 22/100 1 Certifications named 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Wovenwoventeams.com 22/100 1 Certifications named 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.