Transparency alternatives to Feenyx
Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Feenyx does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Feenyx on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Feenyx has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Feenyx does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Feenyx does not | Feenyx publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adafaceadaface.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| HireVuehirevue.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bryqbryq.com | 70/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TestGorillatestgorilla.com | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Toggl Hiretoggl.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| CoderPadcoderpad.io | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CodeSignalcodesignal.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Qualifiedqualified.io | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Criteriacriteriacorp.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Traitifytraitify.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Coderbytecoderbyte.com | 36/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.