Transparency alternatives to Toggl Hire
Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Toggl Hire. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from Toggl Hire on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Toggl Hire has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Toggl Hire” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Toggl Hire | Found at Toggl Hire, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryqbryq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bryq | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CoderPadcoderpad.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CoderPad | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Adafaceadaface.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Adaface | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CodeSignalcodesignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CodeSignal | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Predictive Index | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Qualifiedqualified.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualified | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Criteriacriteriacorp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Criteria | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| HireVuehirevue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HireVue | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Feenyxfeenyx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Feenyx | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Coderbytecoderbyte.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coderbyte | 36/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Vervoevervoe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vervoe | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| iMochaimocha.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to iMocha | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.