Alternatives to HiPeople
Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that HiPeople does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from HiPeople on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
HiPeople has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and HiPeople does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and HiPeople does not | HiPeople publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HireVuehirevue.com | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| TestGorillatestgorilla.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Adafaceadaface.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| CodeSignalcodesignal.com | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Bryqbryq.com | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| CoderPadcoderpad.io | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.com | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Toggl Hiretoggl.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Criteriacriteriacorp.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Qualifiedqualified.io | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| HackerRankhackerrank.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Traitifytraitify.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.