Alternatives to TestGorilla
Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TestGorilla does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from TestGorilla on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
TestGorilla has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and TestGorilla does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and TestGorilla does not | TestGorilla publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HireVuehirevue.com | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| CoderPadcoderpad.io | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bryqbryq.com | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CodeSignalcodesignal.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Qualifiedqualified.io | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Toggl Hiretoggl.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| HackerRankhackerrank.com | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| HiPeoplehipeople.io | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Harverharver.com | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Sapiasapia.ai | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Wovenwoventeams.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.