SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Vervoe

Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Vervoe. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 42 that differ from Vervoe on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Vervoe has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Vervoe” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at VervoeFound at Vervoe, not found there
Bryqbryq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bryq 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
HireVuehirevue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HireVue 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Toggl Hiretoggl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Toggl Hire 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Adafaceadaface.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Adaface 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
CoderPadcoderpad.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CoderPad 48/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Predictive Index 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
TestGorillatestgorilla.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TestGorilla 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
CodeSignalcodesignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CodeSignal 48/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Qualifiedqualified.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualified 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
Criteriacriteriacorp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Criteria 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Feenyxfeenyx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Feenyx 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Traitifytraitify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traitify 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.