Transparency alternatives to Qualified
Other Recruiting assessment vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Qualified. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from Qualified on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Qualified has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Qualified” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Qualified | Found at Qualified, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryqbryq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bryq | 70/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| TestGorillatestgorilla.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TestGorilla | 57/100 | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Toggl Hiretoggl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Toggl Hire | 52/100 | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| CoderPadcoderpad.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CoderPad | 48/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | Compare |
| CodeSignalcodesignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CodeSignal | 48/100 | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Predictive Indexpredictiveindex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Predictive Index | 48/100 | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| HireVuehirevue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HireVue | 43/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Feenyxfeenyx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Feenyx | 39/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Codilitycodility.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Codility | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| HackerRankhackerrank.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HackerRank | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Adafaceadaface.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Adaface | 48/100 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Criteriacriteriacorp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Criteria | 43/100 | 3 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.