SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Routeware

Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Routeware does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Routeware on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Routeware has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Routeware does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Routeware does notRouteware publishes, and they do not
Navixynavixy.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Tookanjungleworks.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Lytxlytx.com 48/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history nothing Compare
Badger Mapsbadgermapping.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Nautonauto.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Netradynenetradyne.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
Routificroutific.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Avriosavrios.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Detrackdetrack.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
SmartRoutessmartroutes.io 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
ABAXabax.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Geotabgeotab.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.